Has one guy in a cave outsmarted all of America's military and intelligence community ?
Q. Fri Sep 7, 8:16 PM By Lin Noueihed and Randall Mikkelsen DUBAI/Washington (Reuters) - Osama bin Laden said in a new video marking the sixth anniversary of al Qaeda's September 11 attacks that the United States was vulnerable despite its military and economic power, but he made no specific threats. In his first video appearance in almost three years, the al Qaeda leader said U.S. President George W. Bush was repeating the mistakes of the former Soviet Union by refusing to acknowledge losses in Iraq. -- The guy Bush said was the terror leader of all evil - and then said they weren't looking for him he didn't matter Threatens America again I am being asked to believe one guy has eluded spy satilties the CIA , Homeland security the FBI and… [cont.]
Asked by Trout - Fri Sep 7 23:58:27 2007 - - 21 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Any person who believes Bin Ladin did anything to the US is a retard. A new Zogby International poll released yesterday shows that 51% of Americans (up from 45% last year) want Bush and Cheney to be directly investigated for their actions on 9/11 and 67% fault the 9/11 Commission for their failure to probe the anomalous collapse of WTC 7. Hours after the release of the poll Bin Laden pops up and promises us a new editorial comment. Coincidence? Precisely the same thing happened last year. On May 23rd 2006, a Zogby poll was released showing nearly half of Americans wanted a new 9/11 investigation. The very next day, Bin Laden popped up to reinforce the official version and threaten new attacks. Can lightening strike twice in the same… [cont.]
Answered by Sugershack - Sat Sep 8 00:10:04 2007

Obama's CIA director pick?
Q. you guys have no idea how the system works , do you? The CIA director does nothing but reporting to the Director of National Intelligence ...you dont need intelligence backgrounf to have that jobb...but the Director of National Intelligence must have a looot of experience here is a source " Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) serves as the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, which is part of the United States Intelligence Community. He/She reports to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). The Director is assisted by the Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Director is nominated by the President, with the concurring or nonconcurring recommendation from the Director of National Intelligence [1]… [cont.]
Asked by Darkenil - Tue Jan 6 07:41:01 2009 - - 15 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I like the pick. Anyone against torture is head over heels better than someone for it.
Answered by Pluto C. Rat - Tue Jan 6 07:45:53 2009

Intelligence communities in USA?
Q. I have read several articles at addresses below about Intelligence communities in USA: I'm confused. Would anybody tell me about the hierarchy of such communities? Who is on top? who is the boss at the end? Don't their missions or operations get interfered by the others? I especially want to know how they don't get meddled with each other in CIA, NSA or DIA. Why should the Department of Defence have both NSA and DIA?
Asked by hercules_voyage - Fri Apr 13 12:06:15 2007 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments

A. The key things to know are: 1 - No one is on top, regardless of what an hierarchical org chart might show (and this is a big, big problem), 2 - There is not a real boss, just someone who runs around trying to get the different agencies to work together, 3 - Yup, they interfere with each other all the time. The whole thing is a metaphor for our federal government bureaucracy.
Answered by Fast Eddie B - Fri Apr 13 12:22:26 2007

Could I please get some feed back on this paper? APA format, How is the writing, Should it have more info etc.
Q. Modern day slavery also known as human trafficking. Traffickers look for individuals who are poor, unemployed, or families that are in high debt, mainly women and children in certain countries. Victims are convinced with false promises of a good job and a better way of living, and then forced to work under abusive and inhuman conditions. Victims of trafficking are brought into the system through several means. Most victims of trafficking today come from three populations. First, parents may sell children to traffickers in order to pay off debts or gain income. Second, runaways or other displaced persons may be picked up by traffickers. Third, people who are seeking entry to other countries may be picked up by traffickers, and typically… [cont.]
Asked by muellerdavidallen - Mon Aug 14 19:02:55 2006 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Modern day slavery is also known as human trafficking. Traffickers look for impoverished, unemployed individuals or families that are in high debt, mainly women and children in certain countries (be more specific-which???). Victims are convinced with false promises of a good job and a better way of living, and then forced to work under abusive and inhuman conditions. Victims of trafficking are brought into the system through several means. (You should separate this-where is your follow up information???) Most victims of trafficking today come from three populations. First, parents may sell children to traffickers in order to pay off debts or gain income. Second, runaways or other displaced persons may be picked up by traffickers. Third, [cont.]
Answered by justme - Mon Aug 14 19:31:11 2006

What does the pro amnesty intend to do about this Mexican border region is experiencing raising crime rate?
Q. The federal government acknowledges that the United States-Mexican border region has been experiencing an alarming rise in the level of criminal cartel activity, including drug and human smuggling, which has placed significant additional burdens on Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies The U.S. border with Mexico extends nearly 2,000 miles along the southern borders of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. In most areas, the border is located in remote and sparsely populated areas of vast desert and rugged mountain terrain with vast open water of the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific oceans. The U.S. government admits that the border s vast length and varied terrain poses significant challenges to U.S. law enforcement… [cont.]
Asked by I'm gonna start another riot - Fri Feb 15 17:14:22 2008 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments

A. the same thing we always do: either catch and release (not talking about fishing) or arrest them, try and convict them in our court system, jail them for 5-25 years, deport them so they can come back new and improved criminals thanks to our outstanding penal system.
Answered by pinkreb004 - Fri Feb 15 17:29:07 2008

Why Hasn't Ron Paul Backed Bill HR 104?
Q. It seems like he would have been one of the first to jump on board. Why hasn't he? A synopsis of the bill: section 1. establishment of commission. There is established the National Commission on Presidential War Powers and Civil Liberties (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the `Commission') to investigate the broad range of policies of the Administration of President George W. Bush that were undertaken under claims of unreviewable war powers, including detention by the United States Armed Forces and the intelligence community, the use by the United States Armed Forces or the intelligence community of enhanced interrogation techniques or interrogation techniques not authorized by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, `ghosting' or… [cont.]
Asked by G. - Mon Jun 1 23:16:52 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Ok. Signed and sent.
Answered by PrivacyNowPlease! - Mon Jun 1 23:39:27 2009

Did the press leave out the word "MAY"? "Iranians may have abandoned this program"?
Q. The just-released unclassified Key Judgments of a still-secret National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) confirm that Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons as recently as 2002 or 2003. This homogenized product of the various intelligence agencies performed under the supervision of the deputy director of national intelligence, Thomas Fingar, avers though that the Iranians may have abandoned this program. The reasons given for such a contention are, to say the least, highly subjective and debatable. The truth is that neither the U.S. intelligence community, nor the International Atomic Energy Agency, nor anybody else outside a very small circle in Iran has certain knowledge about the current state of Iran s nuclear-weapons program, or how far it is… [cont.]
Asked by CONSERVATIVE - Tue Dec 4 16:30:15 2007 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments

Domestic Intelligence Service
Q. Ok long drawn out question here. Is this a decent start for Domestic Intelligence? Please read the "protocol" below ... never mind the simple language because it'll remain put. Even key words like "Balls of Steel" please give me your thoughts. Thanks The Domestic Intelligence Service The following protocol, internal structure and directives are for the advancement and formation of the D.I.S. First and foremost the D.I.S. should operate independetnly of any and all other Federal agencies and entites. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is to-date the only agency officially over seeing domestic intelligence. The F.B.I. is not suited for this task. This goes without saying. The National Security Agency is not suited for the task… [cont.]
Asked by mmabushi - Sun Aug 3 05:23:50 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments

A. It is decently written, but I don't really understand where you're trying to go with this. Is this a paper for a class? Are you seriously trying to start up your own government agency? I can't decide if you're creative or obsessed.
Answered by Jeffrey B - Mon Aug 4 15:05:45 2008

Do you think the CIA/Other Intelligence Agencies and Collaborators Are the Real Terrorist Organizations!?
Q. Britain, fearful of Iran's plans to nationalize its oil industry, came up with the idea for the coup in 1952 and pressed the United States to mount a joint operation to remove the prime minister. The C.I.A. and S.I.S., the British intelligence service, handpicked Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi to succeed Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh and covertly funneled $5 million to General Zahedi's regime two days after the coup prevailed. Iranians working for the C.I.A. and posing as Communists harassed religious leaders and staged the bombing of one cleric's home in a campaign to turn the country's Islamic religious community against Mossadegh's government. If our government s can plan and allow the above to happen, then what stops us from… [cont.]
Asked by Pero - Thu Sep 21 20:17:15 2006 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. of course,if communist china decided america needed a regime change,invaded and arrested bush most americans would hopefully take up arms and be labeled terrorist insurgents.
Answered by sasuke - Thu Sep 21 20:29:49 2006

don't you think mossad killed john f keneddy?
Q. In March, 1992, Illinois Representative Paul Findley said in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, "It is interesting - but not surprising - to note that in all the words written and uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, has never been mentioned." Considering that the Mossad is quite possibly the most ruthless and efficient intelligence agency in the world, it is peculiar that they have never been scrutinized in relation to the Kennedy assassination, especially when practically every other entity in the world (short of Elvis impersonators) has been implicated. But that all changed in January, 1994 with the release of Michael Collins Piper's Final Judgment. In this book, Piper says, "Isr [cont.]
Asked by lion - Thu Dec 11 03:34:12 2008 - - 7 Answers - 1 Comments

A. Israel is not the United States real Allie, Israel has been exploiting the US for its own dirty deeds and domination of the Middle East for the past 60 years. I wouldn't doubt it if this Jew had some involvement with JFK's killing. Got to becareful though man, they might label you as anti-Semitic when in fact Anti-Semitic does not refer to hatred of the jews, it refers to many others, but they use to their own benefits. Dont believe me?
Answered by Gae - Thu Dec 11 06:33:58 2008

Is this a good paper?
Q. The Infiltration of Pakistan s Largest Intelligence Division The ISI, also known as the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, is the largest intelligence division of Pakistan s government. It is also considered to be one of the most successful Intelligence agencies in the world, even rivaling the MI6 and CIA, the intelligence agencies of Great Britain and the U.S. respectively. However, the ISI has also received a tremendous amount of criticism from the rest of the intelligence community and the world. Much of this criticism stems from accusations concerning the ISI s alleged involvement with known terrorist groups throughout the world. To this day, the ISI counters with the argument that they are not providing significant… [cont.]
Asked by Alan B - Sun Mar 29 22:50:33 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments

Is the Federal Government doing it's job protecting America fromTerrorist and illegal alien Foreign Invaders??
Q. In 2005 as many as 4 - 1- million illegal aliens crossed into the United States illegally. During 2005, Boarder Patrol apprehended approximately 1.2 million illegal aliens; of those 165,00 were from Countries other than Mexico. Of the non-Mexican aliens, approximately 650 were from special interest countries. Special interest countries are those designated by the intelligence community as countries that could export individuals that could bring harm to our country in the way of terrorism. LINK: TYPO: In 2005 as many as 4 - 10 million illegal aliens have crossed into the United States.
Asked by ditto - Sat Oct 21 20:23:52 2006 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments

A. No they are not. The republicans and for sure the democrats have let us down. Trust me, when the next terrorist act happens and it will, if it is proven they came through Mexico...it will topple whatever President/Congress. It doesn't matter in this case, they both do not want to do anything about it. It's a shame because thousands will die, neither party wants that to happen, but it will be the end result.
Answered by Rick D - Sat Oct 21 20:56:19 2006

Are Libs behind the CIA leaks?
Q. President Bush speaking in New London, Connecticut. Does that name ring a bell, the name of that town, New London, Connecticut? That's where the Supreme Court's eminent domain decision took private property away from a poor person to give it to rich corporations to increase the tax base. He's there because he's releasing the details, declassified some Al-Qaeda intelligence, which bolsters the administration's contention that Al-Qaeda wants to use Iraq as a staging area to launch terrorist attacks around the world, including here in the United States. Fran Townsend, who is the White House homeland security advisor, said the information was declassified because the intelligence community's tracked down all the leads from the… [cont.]
Asked by GREAT_AMERICAN - Wed May 23 19:42:10 2007 - - 7 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Libs are behind every bad thing happens in this country now.
Answered by RICARDVS - Wed May 23 19:47:56 2007

What kind of American Patriot takes only answers he likes?
Q. He deleted Deidres answer on reagan Ronald Reagan Guilty of Treason & War Crimes As the mass media engaged in an orgy of adulation for Ronald Reagan in June of 2004, many thinking persons were remembering and mourning the deaths of the hundreds of thousands of victims of Ronald Reagan's policies and pondering the lasting damage that the man did not only to the United States but to the world. During Reagan's reign the United States experienced the beginning of the end of what could have been a great nation. Under Reagan, elements within the government engaged in massive criminal activity that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and the entrenchment of a vicious and evil criminal organization that is now firmly in… [cont.]
Asked by Deidre K - Mon Jun 25 16:38:45 2007 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Unfortunately, it's part of the human condition to accept answers that agree with one's POV and discount those that don't. Andit's not just one side of the political or social divide(s), it's everyone.
Answered by Gene B - Wed Jun 27 14:00:34 2007

Why is the world so paranoid about Iran?
Q. I feel like I'm living ahead of my time. you know hwo when you look bakc in histor yand lugh at people's attitudes,I'm doing the smae now. William Blum shows why Iran is no threat: '' * Iran has no right to nuclear weapons: Yet, there is no international law that says that the US, the UK, Russia, China, Israel, France, Pakistan, and India are entitled to nuclear weapons, but Iran is not. Iran has every reason to feel threatened. In any event, the US intelligence community's National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) of December 2007, "Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities", makes a point of saying in bold type and italics: This NIE does not assume that Iran intends to acquire nuclear weapons. The report goes on to state: "We judge… [cont.]
Asked by sweetgirl - Sat Jun 20 21:21:22 2009 - - 4 Answers - 0 Comments

A. Iranian people are great..their gov is run by terrorists.
Answered by Pasargadae - Sat Jun 20 21:51:26 2009

If you are one of the 78% of American Jews who voted for O. did you know this?
Q. February 19, 2009 Obama Reportedly Picks Israel Hater to Lead National Intelligence Council Sammy Benoit Here is another tidbit that may surprise the 78% of American Jews who voted for Barack Obama. According to a report in Cable Foreign Policy, Chas W. Freeman Jr. former US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia is about to be named as Chairman of the National Intelligence Council. Sources tell The Cable that Chas W. Freeman, Jr., the former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, will become chairman of the National Intelligence Council, the intelligence community's primary big-think shop and the lead body in producing national intelligence estimates. For those who are not familiar with the former Ambassador, he is a terrorist apologist and a… [cont.]
Asked by barefoot prince - Fri Feb 20 15:54:31 2009 - - 5 Answers - 0 Comments

A. I've seen sick liberal American Jews deny the holocaust and side with Palestinians. I don't think they'll disagree with Hussein's decision.
Answered by BadKarma - Fri Feb 20 15:59:32 2009

If you have been considering career in the CIA, has US AG Eric Holder's decision to prosecute change your mind?
Q. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder previously postured to investigate and prosecute members of the CIA operating under orders with attorney approval who had engaged in "enhanced interrogation techniques" (e.g. water boarding) with a small group of terrorists after the 9/11 attack. Those interrogations during a time of war led to invaluable information that saved thousands of U.S. lives during the G.W. Bush administration. Then comes the change of administration to Obama, appointing Eric Holder as the new U.S. Attorney General. Under the premise that Bush is responsible for everything that is bad now in the United States, Eric Holder postured to investigate and potentially prosecute these CIA agents who obtained this information from… [cont.]
Asked by Quickdraw - Mon Sep 21 19:11:37 2009 - - 3 Answers - 1 Comments

A. obama and the fkng lib radicals are gutting the military and our clandestine services. wait till the next attack on our soil.9/11 will be like a picnic.
Answered by obamasbro - Mon Sep 21 19:19:06 2009

Is anti-Americanism a new phenomenon. Or did the WOT just bring out the haters that were always there?
Q. I have read much on the issue and I am convinced that the people who hate America today also hated America 20 years ago. Obviously younger generations will learn their hatred of America from their parents, teachers and the spiteful media. - I posted an interesting article on the subject below. The Falseness of Anti-Americanism Pollsters report rising anti-Americanism worldwide. The United States, they imply, squandered global sympathy after the September 11 terrorist attacks through its arrogant unilateralism. In truth, there was never any sympathy to squander. Anti-Americanism was already entrenched in the world's psyche a backlash against a nation that comes bearing modernism to those who want it but who also fear and despise it. … [cont.]
Asked by JohnDoe - Sun Jul 8 20:19:26 2007 - - 9 Answers - 2 Comments

A. Of coarse the haters have always been there. We can't even get a consensus from our closest ally, the British. I suppose we will just need to live with it. It became a national disgrace when the Clintons took office. These two people are not healers by any stretch of the imagination. These are, not one, but two lightning rods that galvanize the American public. If anybody can drive a stake into the American phyche quicker, it would be Hillary's alter ego, Rahm Emanuel., and she hangs on his every word.
Answered by Brad V - Sun Jul 8 20:32:39 2007

Republicans/conservatives --why are you so deathly *afraid* of the NYC trials anyways?
Q. Afraid that America will finally know the truth to the dirty little games or other little secrets you strove to keep locked up and classified for no apparent reason? Just so you guys know: Torture has never been a classified military secret. EVER. Harsh interrogations don't always lead to the truth of the matter or are depended on for "viable intelligence"--because it just wastes our time and the resources of our intelligence communities. Secondly? Our justice system has a 91% conviction rate--which makes it first-rate amongst other leading nations of the world. If they can't handle the DC Sniper or Timothy McVeigh, then they ought to be all fired from their appointed positions--am I right? Third? Countries like Great Britain,… [cont.]
Asked by Sky - Mon Nov 16 20:30:01 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments

A. It's just another issue they can spin to try and damage the Obama administration. It's all about politics.
Answered by Alfred E. Bush - Mon Nov 16 20:34:38 2009

Since the Liberals now claim there were no WMD in Iraq, should Clinton be charged for falisifying information?
Q. he gave Bush? "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. "Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them." President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998. "Fateful decisions will be made in the days and weeks ahead. At issue is nothing less than the… [cont.]
Asked by Mosha #2 - Mon Nov 23 11:27:47 2009 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments

A. A couple of years ago I asked a question as to why people are saying Bush was lying about WMDs when Clinton himself brought it up. Here is that video that supports that question.
Answered by Maverick Zero - Mon Nov 23 11:39:35 2009